An
Interesting Book Review first published in The Newsletter of the
European Society of Hypnosis by Christine GUILLOUX, March 2008
Qu’est-ce
que l’hypnose ? François Roustang Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1994,
Re-Issued 2003,
ISBN
2-7073-1814-0
We
quite often say that every writer is the author of only one book.
Could we say that this book of François Roustang, entitled Qu'est-ce
que l'hypnose, What is hypnosis? is his only book? This reissue, or
new promotion, of this foundational book, this reference book, was
first published in 1994 and seems to have been, unfortunately,
neglected.
François
Roustang (1923- ) has gone into the field of hypnosis after a deep
experience with philosophy, theology and psychopathology, and a
practice of psychoanalysis. He comes aside Léon Chertok and Milton
H.Erickson and has developed a philosophical approach of hypnosis in
relation to the teachings of the oriental school of wisdom. In order
to clarify this mysterious thing and to understand to what it could
be connected and linked, he has committed a number of books, among
them La fin de la plainte, The Ending of Complaining (2000), Il
suffit d'un geste, A Simple Gesture Is Enough (2003); Savoir attendre
pour que la vie change, Learning How To Wait So That Life Changes
(2006).
Qu'est-ce
que l'hypnose? is not a manual, a guide to teach hypnosis. It
questions us about our representations about hypnosis--- a
fascinating phenomenon, a submissive state where we lose judgment and
sensitivity--- and goes back to the basis of perception. He plays
with the notions of general and restrictive waking, of paradoxical
waking. Hypnosis is defined as a state of intense waking in which we
can access the power of setting-up the world.
Five
main sections or themes are the doors to the questioning: the
precondition, the anticipation, the posture, the modification, and
the action. The precondition section shows the different types of
empowering resources we have: the ability to dream, the ability to
set up the world, the ability to imagine. "In paradoxical sleep,
we are submitted to dreams; in paradoxical waking, we introduce
ourselves in them and we wait to see if they are to be continued or
transformed.” (page 30). The section presents how the newborn
evolves and matures in himself through dreams, being immersed in a
society that already has its own rules, structures, stereotypes...,
how the ability of dreaming moves to the ability of imagining when
adult.
Roustang
defines the "unconscious" as what is sleeping during our
limited waking and invites us to pay attention/to open ourselves to
what poets offers us on those paths on the other side of the frontier
conscious/unconscious. Those three abilities are revealed through
anticipation. The hypnotic induction goes through several steps that
can be described as fixation, indetermination/ vagueness,
possibility, and power.
The
relationship between the therapist and the patient is quite strong
and allows the patient to listen to his preoccupations, to be invaded
by them and so, as Milton H.Erickson would say, "Every time you
dissect something in details, you destroy it. You destroy its value."
(page 68). This concept is also proposed by some Buddhists such as
Walpola Rahula. He suggests observing from outside the sensation of
sadness, of worries, of pain; he suggests observing as a scientist.
Then
comes the indetermination/vagueness phase, where the patient is asked
to hallucinate in analgesia or anesthesia. Roustang gives keys to
understand those different levels of dissociation in which the
therapist affords the patient the opportunity to make an internal
representation of what he aims at, and to anticipate how to build
possibilities, quite often through different angles and by trials and
errors. What kind of posture is described here? The posture is
described here as the internal position, the internal arrangement,
the availability of the patient to move, to evolve in a different
way, in a different attitude, in a different mood. This is all the
art of the therapist: to "train" the patient in doing
hypnosis, to listen to all those physical and subconscious physical
signs, to listen to how the symptoms of the patient have appeared in
his connection to the environment in which he lives.
This
posture presents a wide opening of our five senses, for both the
therapist and the patient, and gets into a world of freedom and
harmony in relation to the whole world. In offering absurd tasks to
his patients, Milton Erickson was going further than creating a state
of confusion: he was willing the person to explore a new path, to
discover his freedom and his power. The modification leads us to the
levels of apprenticeship, the access to "a third level",
the ability to imagine, the decision as a reduplication/
intensification, the decision as a reversal, the design/role of the
therapist, from psychology to physics. This section helps us to
understand how hypnotic induction can also be described as a "lack
of anything to do", a non-worry, a nonconcern, a forgetting and
an unlearning.
We
give up a way to relate to the world for another one; we access,
after confusion and emptiness, lightness, mobility, and strength that
are somehow the conditions of change. Léon Chertok mentioned that
"blank hypnosis" is often the more efficient way to help
the patient. Roustang also illustrates a deep modification of life
through a quotation of the example of Betty, who was suicidal and
disappeared for the good, in fact, --- she called Ercikson sixteen
years later---, after being hypnotised by Erickson (Peter Brown, The
Hypnotic Brain, Hypnotherapy and Social Communication, p248) and
shows how the therapist can be an active and very involved
participant in the process.
The
action section contains three angles: to live, to take shape, to let
life live in us. What does hypnotherapy mean: answering to the
patient that comes to us so he can be helped to modify his
relation/connection to the world. Roustang explores here our fears of
losing our control: control of thoughts, feelings, gestures in what
he calls the paradoxical waking. In fact, this fear is the fear to
live, to exist, to confront ourselves with new things, new
experiences, novelties... We have to learn again to walk, how to be
in our walking and get joy from it: "Learning again to walk with
the attention that a child pays when he makes his first steps is not
only a way to relax ourselves and to get rid of our worries. It gives
us the opportunity to discover again the ground which doesn't miss
us, to fully enjoy the movements.” (page 168)
As
therapists, we have to get into this paradoxical waking in order to
be able to welcome, to receive, to care for the patient in his whole
life. We have to be well accustomed/versed in hypnotic techniques, to
overcome them so as to create the space in us to create new ones, to
participate in the dialogue with ease and distance, to observe and to
listen respectfully in the here and now. While we let go, we can
access what Germans call “Gelassenheit”, i.e. at the same time,
calmness, composure and serenity. (...) Practicing paradoxical waking
with patience means to go do long rides in the "gardens of
longevity"." (page 181)
No
need to say that this book is difficult to pass on, for it’s so
rich, so subtle, so vivid. The language and the style are also
pleasant journeys and have delicate and elegant flavors. Here in
France, François Roustang gained some kind of reputation as the
nectar of Ericksonian Hypnosis. Qu'est-ce que l'hypnose? really
deserves your attention, and to be read and read again to obtain a
better understanding of the deepness of our practice as
hypnotherapists. If I were to add something with my poetical style:
Accepter dirait la bonne morale, faire contre mauvaise fortune bon
cœur. Jouer de soi dans cet aller et retour qui ouvre, qui offre de
multiples visions du monde, de soi, tout en sachant que ce n'est
qu'un jeu et que le jeu en vaut la chandelle. Allers et retours,
détours, contours, facettes si nombreuses, si multiples, si
irrisantes, aveuglantes parfois que l'on finit par se laisser prendre
au piège d'un seul reflet, d'une seule facette. Volonté de
non-volonté, vouloir sans vouloir, se laisser effleurer, affleurer à
l'intérieur de soi de ces multitudes de rives, d'abords, de débords.
Acceptance
could say moral philosophy, putting on a brave face. Playing with
oneself in this trip to and from oneself opens and offers multiple
visions of the world and of oneself. Yet, even though we know that
it's only a game, one plays that game and knows that the game is
worth the candle. It is worth the light. There are so many, so
multiple, so iridescent, return tickets, detours, bends, twists,
turns, and facts. So blinding sometimes that one gets trapped in only
one reflection, one only facet. Willing not-wanting, willing without
wanting, let oneself be lightly touched, surface inside oneself into
those numerous shores, accesses, overflows. ----
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.